MAINTENANCE POLICY: cirteria & strategies we use in making maintenance.
-> There are two types of maintenance:
- CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE (CM): maintenance intervention is performed after failure occurrence;
- PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (PM): maintenance intervention is performed before failure occurence.
-> TYPE:
- CYCLE MAINTENANCE, TBM: PM actions are carried out at:
- Set-times (clock based)
- Fixed age/usage of the component (age-based);
- CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE, CBM: PM actions are based on the condition of the component being maintened.
-> Involves monitoring of one (or more) parameters characterizing the wear process (e.g. crack growth in a mechanical component).
- PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE: PM actions are based on the evaluation of the trend of one or more parameters, that are clearly linked to the wear process (normally thorough a mathematical model).
Accompanying Maintenance Measures:
- OPPORTUNISTIC MAINTENANCE: making maintenance actions on secondary components (e.g. replacements of secondary components), in correspondence of an asset/ machine stand-by, due to a corrective or preventive maintenance operation.
- PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE: set of continuous improvement actions, inspired by the JIT production “phylosophy” that can improve equipement reliability and maintainability.
Preventive Maintenance:
Cyclic Maintenance:
-> DEF: PM actions are carried out at set-times (clock-based) or at a fixed age/usage of the component (age-based)
-> requires statistical knowledge of the failure mode;
-> Well suited if:
- Failure rate has a well defined and growing shape (refer to the bathub shape);
- Cost of the TBM policy lower than the cost of the CM policy.
Condition Based Maintenance (CBM):
-> DEF: PM actions are based on the condition of the component being maintened.
-> Well Suited if:
- Cost of the TBM policy is lower than the cost of the CM policy;
- Cost of the CBM policy is lower than the cost of the TBM policy.
Analysis of Failure Times:
TTF or TBF (Time To Failure, Time Between Failures): it is the calendar time intercurring between 2 sequential failures (for a repairable/ not repairable entity);
OTTF or OTBF (Operating Time To/ Between Failures): time between 2 subsequential failure measured on the cumulated operating time (for a repairable/ not repairable entity).
- MTTF (Mean Time To Failure): mean time to failure of non repairable entities (can be evaluated considering both the calendar or the operating time, i.g. OTTF);
- MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures): mean time between failures of repariable entites (can be evaluated considering both the calendar or the operating time, i.e. OTBF)
System Availability:
Problem Setting:
-> Failures (or breakdown) leads to performance losses at each machine and, subsequently, at system level;
- The impact of failures can be different depending on the configuration of the system.
- DOWNTIME STATE: performance of the machine are lost (0 productivity);
-> The system availability can be evaluated by analyzing the configuratno of the system, based on the availability of each single machine.
-> We have to study the availability of the system starting from the availabilities of each component (machine/ station).
Study:
- Analyze the function carried out by the machiens for the production capacity of the whole system.
- Evaluate the impac of unabailability of the machines on the availability/ unavailability of the manufacturing system, thus on the whole production capacity (in order to meet the demand).
Availability Analysis:
-> Devise the configuration fo the system (a Functional Block Diagram of the manufacturing system), in order to analyze how much the production flow is affected by failures:
- Helps planning a reference scenario where in the expected technological routings of the production mix are considered.
-> EXAMPLE:
-> Now the system is working at ist theoretical production capacity.
-> In this configuration we have a reduction of the production capacity.
-> The production capacity is equal to zero.
Performance Evaluation: State Space Method
-> HP:
- State of the system depends on the state reached by its machines.
- Each machine is working/ degrading independently of the others.
- States of the system are mutually exclusive.
-> The method can be used to provide a rough estimate of the expected systema availability & production capacity.
- Firstly introduced as a method for logical analysis of the functions played by a system of interest.
- Grounded on a logical analysis of the functions required by the “system of interest”.
- It prepare the ground for a quantitative evaluation.
-> IDEA: an event may happen/a state may be subsequently reached by each machine during a given time interval; then the state of the manufacturing system is defined by considering the functions relevant for the system under concern, based on the states reached by the machines => is possible to calculate the total production capacity actually/ effectively available due to the still functioning machines after a given time interval.
-> OBJ: provide a rough estimate of the expected availability/ production capacity of the system.
Steps:
1.The system is modelled through a state space table where:
- Each machine is assigned its own state indicator;
- System is assigned its own state indicator:
STATE SPACE TABLE: shows the status of the machines.
- Status are mutually exclusive.
- Each components (of the MS) M_i is assigned an indicator with the following property:
- S_i = 0 => Machine breakdown.
=> Requires mainetnance;
=> Is featuring a zero production capacity.
- S_i = 1 => The machine is producing.
- S_I formally depend on the time => after some time has passed, the overall breakdowns result from the set of installed machines.
2.The expected system availability & production capacity is calculated based on the states of the system defined in the state space table.
Procedure:
- );
- );
- Evaluate the probability of each state of the system:
4.Evaluate the production capacity due to each state:
5. Calculate the expected production capacity due to all states:
6. Calculate the expected system availability due to all states:
-> The probability of a state of the system is calculated based on a rough estimate of the probability of the state reached by each machine (alternative 1 – “operating times”):
📌Bernoulli distribution => We can modellate the use of operating times as probababiliti Sj=1 / 0
The availability depends on:
- Technological characteristics of product types (as materials to be manufactured on given machine types);
- Number of machines and their state (dependent on their characteristics as reliability and maintainability);
- Ability to schedule preventive maintenance;
-> It is difficult to evaluate the impact of unavailability of the machines on the availability/unavailability, thus the production capacity (i.e. to meet the demand), of the manufacturing system.